Rudolf Schröck | The Atlantic Monthly | June 2005

lindbergh_book

Charles Lindbergh is the most legendary aviator of the United States. With his nonstop solo flight from New York to Paris in May 1927, he became an American national hero overnight – seen as a modern-day Christopher Columbus. The “Lone Eagle” in his one-engine “Spirit of St. Louis” became the first media star of the 20th century. And he took many secrets with him to his grave.

When 72-year-old Charles Lindbergh died of cancer in Hawaii on August 26, 1974, he had planned every detail of his death. His three sons Jon, Land and Scott had his grave placed as he wished with a view of the sea. His daughters Anne and Reeve arranged the funeral service according to his meticulous plans. Only his wife, Anne Morrow, was allowed to sit at his deathbed when Lindbergh exhaled his last breath, and then kiss him. But only afterwards.

Lindbergh died like he had lived, obsessed with planning and organization, even in the intimate circle of his family. He was puritanical, God-fearing, disciplined. At least this is how every American biographer of Lindbergh – there are about 15 of them – has described him. Then came along the eminent biographer A. Scott Berg, who received the Pulitzer Prize in 1999 for his book on Lindbergh about the “idol of the 20th century.”

American biographers have long had nightmares over documenting his life because the aviator took his secrets to his grave. But now, more than 30 years after his death, the truth has finally come forward.

The true history of Lindbergh took place outside the U.S. It consists of a perfectly concealed double life in Europe. For nearly two decades, Lindbergh had three clandestine families in Germany and Switzerland, fathering seven in total.

This new, other Lindbergh story began in spring of the year 1957 in Munich. Lindbergh, officially director of Pan American Airways and traveling undercover as a special consultant to American President Dwight D. Eisenhower and the Strategic Air Command (SAC) of the United States military, met the two sisters Brigitte and Mariette Hesshaimer in an apartment in Schwabing during a visit to Bavaria.

One sister was 24 years younger, the other 22 years younger than the tall, blond man in his mid-50s, whose American marriage with bestseller author Anne Morrow (“Gift from the Sea”) was in crisis after Anne’s secret affair with her family doctor.

Brigitte was a milliner, her sister Marietta, a painter. Both women were pretty and single, but physically disabled since childhood as a result of a tuberculosis infection. And both of them fell in love with the handsome American, who was a national hero and brigadier general in the United States with a family and five children. (A sixth child, the first-born Charles Lindbergh Junior, was kidnapped as a baby and murdered.)

Lindbergh returned the sisters’ love, first with the younger sister, Brigitte. When the two of them stood before the stone lions of Munich’s Feldherrenhalle during a secret rendezvous in March 1957, Charles said to Brigitte: “Why aren’t the lions roaring? I was told that those in love can hear them roaring.” Brigitte hugged and kissed him, and for the first time took him to her apartment in Agnesstrasse in Munich-Schwabing.

Thus began a love story that lasted for 17 years, with consequences. Brigitte gave birth to three Lindbergh children: Dyrk (born in 1958), Astrid (born in 1960) and David (born in 1967). From then on, Lindbergh visited his family in Munich several times a year, but always only for a few days. The children recall a tender father, who always arrived in a Volkswagen beetle wearing a beret, and who drove with them to Isartal, wandered with them in the mountains and explained nature to them. The mother told the children that their father was a famous writer from the United States with the name “Careu Kent.” He had been trusted with a secret mission, and therefore the children should never talk about their father, not in the daycare center, not in school, not with their friends. Their birth certificates declare: “father unknown.”

Only much later (in the mid-1980s), when Dyrk, Astrid, and David had long come of age and their mysterious father had long since passed away, did they learn the truth about their true identity. But they were sworn to absolute secrecy by their mother. Charles Lindbergh would have wanted it that way. He had given her his life’s motto: “Life will work it out!”

And life did work it out. Astrid discovered about 150 airmail letters from “C.” (as each letter was signed) to Brigitte Hesshaimer, secretly stowed away in a garbage bag. These letters are the secret love letters from Lindbergh to Astrid’s mother, a correspondence that lasted for nearly 20 years. The last letter to Brigitte is dated 10 days before his death. With a shaky hand, Lindbergh wrote to his secret German lover from his New York hospital that his end was near and that he had set up a bank account in Switzerland for her and the children to secure their lives in the future. Then comes the final sentence – like Lindbergh’s legacy to the double life he kept so secret: “Hold the utmost secrecy!”

Secrecy is the recurrent theme of Lindbergh’s letters, which reveal the nearly incredible existence of the Atlantic aviator’s second life in postwar Europe. Lindbergh didn’t only love Brigitte and have three children with her.

At the same time he had a sexual relationship with Brigitte’s sister Marietta, who bore two sons – Vago and Christoph. A second Lindbergh-Hesshaimer family was founded, for whom he had a beautiful house built according to his own design in a vineyard in Grimisuat in the Swiss canton Valais. Here the deeply reclusive Mariette lives today.

And a third lover, whom Lindbergh also swore to secrecy, is still alive, an 80-year-old living in Baden-Baden on the outskirts of the Black Forest. His former private secretary, Valeska, the descendent of an old Prussian military aristocracy, bore Lindbergh two more children – a son and a daughter. Altogether, Lindbergh had three lovers who bore him seven children, most of them born between 1958 and 1967.

When she died in 2001, Lindbergh’s wife Anne Morrow never even suspected that her husband led a double life in Europe. The letters his three lovers sent him in the United States were addressed to post-office boxes that he changed on a regular basis. Not one single love letter written by the three women to Lindbergh has been found, whereas his entire love correspondence to Brigitte has been preserved.

But the question remains: What drove this meticulous American pilot, who led a model marriage in the United States and had an exemplary family of many children, to set up and lead a polygamous existence after the Second World War with three clandestine families in Europe until the end of his life?

Certainly one major reason was that Lindbergh had never fully shook off the aftermath of his legendary Atlantic flight. Lindbergh, the anti-intellectual mechanical whiz and simple farmer’s boy from the Midwest, became an American national hero after his unprecedented pioneer accomplishment. He belonged to the American public. Overnight he became the most photographed American of that period. It put Lindbergh in a situation that he hated and exposed him to what he perceived as the potentially threatening forces of the mass media.

Lindbergh felt himself to be constantly persecuted and humiliated. When his 20-month-old son was kidnapped and murdered in 1932, there were always two perpetrators in his eyes: the kidnapper and the press. He was convinced that his son would never have been kidnapped without the “Lindbergh hype” created by the media. In postwar Europe, where Lindbergh could travel around unrecognized, he could fulfill his dream of happiness and emotionality. As a monopolized national hero, he could not live out this dream in the United States.

But this only partly explains the phenomenon of Lindbergh and his double life. Most of his American biographers have steered well clear of the fact that Charles Lindbergh was a staunch eugenicist, someone who believes in the improvement of the human species through the control of hereditary factors in mating. He believed in natural selection and in the existence of good genes. Heavily influenced by his friend Dr. Alexis Carrel, a race theorist and Nobel prizewinner in medicine, Lindberg was convinced that his genetic code (which he called “life flow”) ought to be passed on – even outside his marriage.

That he fathered five children with two disabled sisters may surprise an advocate of eugenics. Lindbergh, however, was not a racist ideologue, but a pragmatist. The rules he advanced in his books (such as “Autobiography of Values”), did not apply to him, only to others.

In the core of his being, he was an adventurer, an aviator, a pioneer, who anarchistically put himself above the conventions of American society and its puritanical morals. He was an adherent of the nonconformist writer Henry David Thoreau (“On the Duty of Civil Disobedience”), whose commitment to the individualism of primitive man against the normative dictatorship of bourgeois civilization fascinated him.

Still unanswered in America today is the controversial question: Was Lindbergh a Nazi, or a Hitler sympathizer? The basis for this allegation was Lindbergh’s acceptance of the Nazi medal of honor, the “Meritorious Order of the German Eagle,” from Hermann Göring. Without advance notice, the Eagle medal was given to the “Lone Eagle” in the American Embassy in Berlin while visiting Germany on a secret service mission for the U.S. government. He slipped the medal into his pocket, much to the delight of U.S. Ambassador Hugh Wilson, who declared that a refusal to accept the decoration would have been a “diplomatic catastrophe.” The more so since Lindbergh had been assigned to spy on German aircraft weapons.

Lindbergh’s problems started when he returned to the United States and joined the isolationist anti-war movement “America First.” Earlier, President Franklin D. Roosevelt had offered him a cabinet post as secretary of aviation if he would renounce his isolationism. But the obstinate farmer’s boy from the Midwest remained true to his convictions and opposed the war. This was a strategic blunder, and a death sentence to his career in politics.

Lindbergh, the former national hero, became a persona non grata and from then on was regarded as a “Nazi sympathizer.” It was
a political character assassination – even if in part self-inflicted as he politically shot himself in the foot. He was not talented politically and uncompromising.

The American best-selling author and leftwing intellectual Gore Vidal proposed in his Lindbergh essay, “Lindbergh: The Eagle Is Grounded,” that the whole American fuss about Lindbergh and the Nazis be set aside and that the daring Atlantic aviator replace the antiquated Uncle Sam as the American symbolic figure: “Meanwhile, it might be a pleasant gift to the new century and the new millennium to replace the pejorative 1812 caricature of a sly treacherous Uncle Sam with that of Lindbergh, the best that we are ever apt to produce in the hero line, American style.”

And the Lindbergh family? Exactly one year ago, Reeve Morrow Lindbergh, the youngest “legal” daughter of Charles Lindbergh and president of the “Charles A. Lindbergh and Anne Morrow Lindbergh Foundation,” visited her seven European siblings in Germany and Switzerland without any press and media fanfare. Reeve met with Astrid, Dyrk and David (Brigitte Hesshaimer’s children), with Vago and Christoph (Marietta Hesshaimer’s children), and with Valeska’s two Lindbergh children.

Thirty years after the death of the “Lone Eagle,” his children on both sides of the Atlantic embraced – in love for their father, the first human in the world to cross that very ocean in a solo flight 77 years ago. Even Hollywood could not have dreamt up a more touching finale: The struggle for truth within a family became a happy ending for a German-American love story.

- Rudolf Schröck (55) is a screenplay writer and publicist in Munich. He is the author of the biography “Das Doppelleben des Charles A. Lindbergh (the double life of Charles A. Lindbergh),” Heyne Verlag/Random House.

28 Responses to “The Lone Eagle’s Clandestine Nests. Charles Lindbergh’s German secrets. By Rudolf Schröck”


  1. 1 Michael Tim February 28, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    I love your site!

    _____________________
    Experiencing a slow PC recently? Fix it now!

  2. 2 rick64z March 14, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    This is quite a good background for reading A Talent to Deceive by Willim Norris (2006)…more Lindbergh lies.

  3. 3 cheryl June 3, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    This is downright weird. I googled the keywords Charles Lindbergh and eugenics, and almost every result was a Lindbergh apologetic site.

    “He didn’t really look down upon the Jews” “He wasn’t a racist” blah blah blah.

    The more modern eugenics movement may have removed the race factor from their statements, but back in the early 20th century, there was no mistaking that the eugenics folks were a lot about race.

    I saw a documentary about Lindbergh’s mistresses and the resulting children. The show never re-ran as far as I know.

  4. 4 Claudean July 17, 2009 at 9:15 pm

    For all the Lindbergh detractors, it is easy to throw rocks. You simply have not read enough of his voluminous writings to get a feel for the kind of person he really was. Charles A. Lindbergh was a complex, intelligent genius–a man ahead of his time. Or maybe a man transposed here from another, greater time.

    In nothing I have read do I see him as a “Jew-hater” or a “Jew-baiter”. Lindhergh DID have enemies who delighted in smearing him in criminal ways. Foremost among them was dirty politics in Washington D.C. at the time, including Rooseveldt who wanted war. That’s right–Rooseveldt wanted war to pull us out of the lingering Great Depression. Lindbergh did not want us to get involved in the war. The rest isn’t hard to figure out, is it?!

  5. 5 Claudean July 17, 2009 at 9:23 pm

    Furthermore–Charles A. Lindbergh shall forever be my hero. The new information about his Geman family only makes me admire him more. He had a family in America, true. But his wife was unattractive, with a nose spread all over her face. She was from a “connected” family, however. She was also the first to have an affair, according to the Berg biography, “Lindbergh”. By that time in life she was resembling her late mother, Betty Morrow, who was extremely ugly in old age.

    That Lindbergh was lonely, under-appreciated, and felt betrayed at this time in his life made him vulnerable. More power to the hero of 1927 for returning again and again across the Atlantic to sow his seed. This news makes me extremely happy!

    • 6 KFS January 2, 2011 at 4:38 pm

      What a horrible comment.

      First, Anne Morrow Lindbergh was not an unattractive woman. She was, in fact, quite pretty (the many photos of her certainly don’t lie) – nor do media accounts of her “winsome” ways and petite figure.

      Furthermore, physical characteristics aside, I think the personal struggles and trials and tribulations of this marriage should remain just that – personal.

      People seem to enjoy shredding and dissecting the lives of others for sport or to feel “smart.”

      There seems to be a fundamental need to forget we are talking about REAL PEOPLE who lead real lives and had real feelings. They are not fictional characters or case studies. They lived, breathed, had favorite things and foibles too.

      This need to think we know “more” in hindsight than the people who lived these lives themselves is the ultimate in arrogance.

      These people – this woman – lost a CHILD. Her child was MURDERED and the best you can come up with is “good for her husband in fathering other children, she wasn’t Miss America in her old age?”

      • 7 Jeanne Aldrich February 26, 2011 at 9:16 pm

        Wow, Beautifully put Cheryl! I so agree. Let’s remain respectful and not pretend we know of others hearts and certainly not stoop small enough to judge by the size of a person’s nose. My grandma used to say “what Peter says about Paul, says more about Peter than it does about Paul.” So aptly put in this case. Thank you for your gracious and kind response.

    • 8 Cheryl January 4, 2011 at 2:33 pm

      That just goes to show that you are as “downright weird” as Lindbergh was. No need to comment further. Your voluminous words speak for yourself just as CL’s did for him.

      • 9 KFS January 4, 2011 at 2:53 pm

        You can choose to be upset with CAL all you want but attacking his (deceased) wife for sport is just petty and small and serves no purpose at all.

  6. 10 Rebecca November 8, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    I wonder if the truth about his little baby son will ever be made known to those who truly suspect his involvement in the kidnapping, and sending an innocent man to the death chair.

  7. 11 harry March 17, 2010 at 10:51 pm

    Remember this title: Beneath the Winter Sycamores. The truth about the kidnapping is coming soon!

    • 12 Allen April 21, 2010 at 9:12 pm

      Wasn’t this book (‘Winter Sycamores’) based on a letter from one Arthur Jones, featured in the National Enquirer? Didn’t Jones say that the baby was kidnapped by Violet Sharp?

      So who built the ladder?

  8. 13 raymond May 2, 2010 at 1:38 am

    I heard about Arthur Jones years ago. He knew about the kidnapping because he was on deathrow with Hauptmann. I am going to order Beneath the Winter Sycamores right away.

  9. 14 Nigel May 4, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    I read it. It is quite good actually. It makes one wonder what really happened.

  10. 15 jeffreynewmanlaw July 21, 2010 at 12:03 am

    I interviewed Arthur Jones for several hours one afternoon, several years ago, when I was a reporter for The National Enquirer. His conversations with Bruno Hauptmann are depicted in Under the Sycamores and is worth reading. Perhaps no one will ever be able to uncover the truth about what happened, or whether Jones was being truthful about what Hauptmann said. I can only say that sitting with Jones and asking him questions, listening to his measured responses, I believe he was telling the truth. Jones was a lifer, having been sentenced to prison when he was 20. He had lost his leg to diabetes and sat, his stump visible, a patient thoughtful man who spoke with a halting stutter but in full blossomed sentences. Jones had survived many years in a place I might not be able to live for a few years. He had a ready smile and seemed to me to have a clear memory of Hauptmann. His record confirmed he had been on death row with Hauptmann. The rest needs to be dredged back from time.

    Jeffrey A. Newman Jeffrey.newman1@gmail.com

  11. 16 swoods@gmail.com January 1, 2011 at 8:51 pm

    It is amazing that Newman’s interview and Bahm’s book BENEATH THE WINTER SYCAMORES have not been brought to the floor for discussion. I believe they are on to something.

  12. 17 Allen K. January 1, 2011 at 9:04 pm

    There are some interesting FAQs at lindytruthDOTorg.

    The latest theory is that Condon, Lindbergh, Sharp, and Hauptmann were all in on the crime together. Jones’ letters have been floating around for over 50 years.

    Does it get any better than that?

    Allen

  13. 18 Nigel January 4, 2011 at 2:57 pm

    It is hard to believe after reading the Winter Sycamores book that Lindbergh wasn’t a main cog in the disappearance of his own son. You Americans don’t want to lose your hero!

  14. 19 Allen K. January 4, 2011 at 11:07 pm

    “…Lindbergh wasn’t a main cog in the disappearance of his own son”

    Well, if anyone wishes to believe that Hauptmann, and Condon, and Betty Gow, and Violet Sharpe, and how many others(?), were all involved in the kidnapping of the baby, then “Winter Sycamores” is the book for you. Jones had been trying to peddle, er, interest people in his letter for many years and he would no doubt be thrilled to see an entire book on this subject, even if it is “creative non-fiction.”

    I suppose it is an improvement on another book of the early 1990′s (by Ahlgren & Monier) that claimed that Lindbergh himself wrote the ransom note.

    The ‘Sycamores’ book even mixes up the handwriting expert with the wood maven. It must be a delight to further stir up the pot of conspiracy for those who enjoy this kind of thing. At least, Bahm/Jones don’t exculpate Hauptmann, the escaped ex-con and illegal alien from Germany.

  15. 20 nigel January 8, 2011 at 11:20 pm

    And I suppose your Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone as well!

  16. 21 jcrnfrd@yahoo.com February 8, 2011 at 4:26 am

    Charles Lindburgh had a dark side. Publicly famous flyer, writer & family man. Privately leading a double life. He sired 7 illigitamate children, demanding secrecy from their 3 mothers. Did these women keep quiet due to love or financial support? Or was the charisma & fame that initially impressed them later recognized as a power to be feared? Since reading “Crime of the Century” years ago, I’ve felt Lindburgh’s had sadistic tendencies. Biographies note his enjoyment of practical jokes. Putting frogs in a friend’s bed, pouring on ice water to wake a friend, etc. But often the jokes were cruel. He substituted kerosene for drinking water resulting in a friend being hospitalized. And oddly, prior to his son’s kidnapping, Lindbergh played a strangely similar joke on his wife. He hid their baby in a closet then told everyone the child had been kidnapped.His wife frantically & hysterically hunted the child for half an hour. Was the “real” kidnapping another joke, but one that went wrong? Did Lindburgh fall or drop the baby causing injury or death that he then had to cover up? Lindbergh was hugely famous, above reproach. Not only was he not interviewed as a possible suspect, he took control & led the investigation. After the trial, he moved to Europe, but never lived in one place long. Why? Perhaps to elude further prying, detection, or charges if suspicion fell upon him. What if the child’s disappearance wasn’t even a joke gone bad but was actually planned. Lindburgh has been described as cold, aloof, controlling. Controlling, self-centered men are often jealous when their wives’ attention naturally moves from them to their first child. Wife Anne accompanied Lindburgh as navigator on a flight that broke the transcontinental record. She was 7 months pregnant. In order to avoid bad weather, Lindburgh took the plane over 10,0000 ft. Planes weren’t pressurized then & the height deprived them all of oxygen. Lindburgh showed no ill effects, but Anne was in so much pain she had to be carried off the plane. In essence, Lindbergh in his callous self-centeredness chose breaking a record over the safety of his wife & unborn child. He loved attention, maybe the kidnapping would accomplish several goals – to eliminate a child he resented while obtaining the sympathy of a nation as he basked in the media spotlight again. And Anne was stuck with him – decent women in those days avoided divorce at all costs. She defied him in some ways though, like going for psychotherapy something he didn’t want her to do. Maybe she needed it because he was unbearable to live with or she’d long suspected his hand in the child’s death. And some on this site rationalize that it was ok for Charles to endulge in affairs because his wife had cheated on him with her doctor during the 1950′s. I would venture a guess that a man who can lead a double life – keeping up not one, not two, but three mistresses & their children – is a man who has cheated many, many times. And that he could cheat with his secretary & her two friends that were sisters & keep all that juggling speaks of a man who was one amazing manipulator. Oh, and if you look into Charles Lindburgh’s family, you’ll find that his grandfather was a bank manager accused of bribery & embezzlement who left his wife & 7 children in Sweden, moved to the US with his mistress & illegitimate son(Charles Lindbergh’s father), & changed his name. Grandpa had 6 more children before marrying the mistress(21 yrs after the 1st wife died.) Considering how he was likely raised, the double life doesn’t seem too unusual now. And that such a man might kill his own child, or would cover up an accidental death, wouldn’t surprise me at all.

  17. 22 jcrnfrd@yahoo.com February 8, 2011 at 4:29 am

    what happened to “your email address will not be published?”

  18. 23 nigel February 11, 2011 at 9:09 pm

    I don’t know if he was quite psychopathic enough to kll his own child but he was certainly capable of sending him to another country to have someone else take care of him as BTWS asserts.

  19. 24 Michael April 28, 2011 at 11:26 pm

    Love story? I think not. A Eugenist who wanted to help reconstitute the gene-pool after the devastation caused to the “Master Race” after the War.

    Jones is an interesting angle. If someone wants to hoax others they usually brush up on the basics to make it sound more believable. The fact Jones recalls some things that can’t be true means (to me) he was either a really bad liar or he hadn’t researched any of it – and was repeating what he remembered to be true.

    Now, one can look into this themselves then draw whatever informed conclusion they like. Or, in the alternative, you can listen to the likes of Allen “Big Foot” K who knows as much about this Case as you will let him.

    Thanks but no thanks.

  20. 25 darby cayo May 20, 2011 at 7:02 pm

    I have read all the anne lindbergh books that I can find and now need to know where to find the Rudolph Schrock book on CAL– any one know where?

  21. 26 darby cayo May 20, 2011 at 7:04 pm

    I have read all the anne lindbergh books that I can find and now need to know where to find the Rudolph Schrock book on CAL– any one know where? I also read Reeve’s books

    • 27 Allenamet@aol.com May 20, 2011 at 8:00 pm

      Hello Darby,

      The book you refer to was published in Germany and of course in the German language.

      As far as I know, it has not been translated yet, and is not (generally) available in the US. Some research libraries, including our own, do have the original edition (by Random House) and it is illustrated.

      It is a minor mystery (considering CAL’s interest in Eugenics) as to why at least 2 of the three women involved had serious physical maladies.

  22. 28 denver May 29, 2011 at 2:11 am

    Darby, you really need to read Shrock or Bahm because you will find out about the real Lindbnergh.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 62 other followers

Adams in Patriotic Mode

“What do we mean by the American Revolution? Do we mean the American war? The Revolution was effected before the war commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments, of their duties and obligations…This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people was the real American Revolution.” John Adams

The Declaration of Independence

The Union Oyster House

Frech Ocean-fresh New England seafood delivered directly to your door

Benjamin Franklin: A Documentary History – J. A. Leo Lemay

B & M Baked Beans

Blog Stats

  • 415,572 hits

Pages


My blog is worth $3,387.24.
How much is your blog worth?

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 62 other followers


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 62 other followers

%d bloggers like this: